The Politicized Pulpit: South Korea's Churches at a Crossroads Between Radicalization and Renewal
Change won’t be easy, as it requires the Church to admit its shortcomings, potentially losing its power and members who prioritize political alignment over religious conscience.
Recent Articles
K-Beauty Moves Fast. But Can It Stay Distinct?
Walk into an Olive Young store in Seoul today, and it becomes clear that K-beauty is no longer defined only by large legacy brands. Shelves are filled with names that did not exist, or were barely visible a few months ago. Some sell a single viral toner pad. Others focus on ampoules, or minimalist skincare routines. Products rise quickly through rankings, social media clips, and online reviews, only to disappear behind the next trend a few weeks later. What looks like consumer obsession with trends is also the result of structure. Korea has built a beauty industry that moves rapidly. Korea still has large integrated cosmetics companies such as Amorepacific and LG H&H, which have long managed broad parts of the beauty business, from research and development to manufacturing, branding, and distribution. Yet the recent beauty boom follows a different model. Instead of controlling every stage of production and distribution themselves, they move through a connected system of manufacturers, retailers, social media platforms, and export networks. This structure makes launching a beauty brand easier than before. Original Design Manufacturing (ODM) companies can handle formulation, production, packaging, and quality control, allowing small brands to focus more on branding and marketing. Olive Young gives indie brands visibility through rankings, reviews, shelf placement, and online exposure. Social media platforms such as TikTok and Instagram rapidly circulate textures, ingredients, and product formats across borders, and export platforms help smaller brands reach overseas consumers earlier in their life cycle. Together, these layers create a market optimized for speed. Products can move from concept to shelf quickly, and trends can spread almost immediately through social media and retail rankings. When a toner pad, ampoule, or sunscreen texture becomes popular online, similar products often flood the market within a short period of time. Brands react quickly to what is already gaining attention, which makes the industry highly responsive but also increasingly repetitive. That constant cycle of launches and imitation has helped transform K-beauty into a global phenomenon. The low barrier to entry allows indie brands to appear continuously, making the market feel dynamic and experimental. Consumers are exposed to endless product discovery, while brands respond quickly to changing preferences. Compared with earlier generations of beauty retail, where consumers often stayed loyal to a few established brands, today’s shopping experience is driven more by constant discovery and rapid trend turnover. As a result, K-beauty constantly produces something new, yet much of that newness can begin to feel strangely familiar. Many newer brands rely on similar manufacturers, ingredients, minimalist packaging, and social media language. Products compete through immediate visibility—a viral ingredient or a celebrity campaign—instead of aiming for long-term recognition. For example, once PDRN serums become popular on TikTok and appear in Olive Young rankings, dozens of similar products quickly follow. As more brands converge around the same trend, consumers increasingly remember the ingredient rather than the brands behind it. The result is a shopping experience driven by continuous trend-chasing, making consumer loyalty difficult to sustain. This does not necessarily mean the products themselves are weak. K-beauty continues to produce technically sophisticated and trend-responsive products with strong formulations and fast product development cycles. What feels less distinct, however, is the identity behind many of the brands. As more companies chase rapidly changing trends, brand images can begin to blur together. Earlier generations of K-beauty often built clearer aesthetic worlds and emotional positioning. Brands such as 3CE felt recognizable through a specific visual identity and mood. Consumers remembered the brand and the lifestyle it presented, not simply the individual products. Today’s indie brands operate in a much faster and more crowded environment. The market feels more dynamic than before, yet the trend itself often becomes more memorable than the brand behind it. This shift also changes how consumers experience beauty shopping. Consumers scroll through TikTok clips, compare Olive Young rankings, watch influencer reviews, and quickly move on to the next launch. Shopping increasingly feels like continuous browsing rather than long-term attachment to a brand. New products appear constantly, micro-trends spread rapidly, and consumers are encouraged to keep searching for what comes next rather than settling on a particular brand. For indie brands, this creates a different kind of challenge. K-beauty already knows how to move quickly, but speed alone is no longer enough to make a brand memorable. In an industry where trends often receive more attention than the brands behind them, building long-term recognition and consumer loyalty becomes increasingly difficult. This is why the future challenge for K-beauty is differentiation. The industry’s ecosystem has lowered barriers to entry and opened opportunities for smaller brands. That accessibility is one of K-beauty’s greatest strengths. By relying on value chains, indie brands can reach consumers more easily than ever before. Given this unprecedented opportunity, indie brands should try more than trend imitation to stand out. Beyond keeping pace with trends, they may need to build a recognizable image, consistent vision, and lasting relationship with consumers.
2026 is the new 2016
The Chainsmokers, the puppy dog filter with the tongue out, King Kylie wearing a satin bomber jacket with a velvet choker: all of this reminds us of the 2016 era vibes. We all agree that 2026 isn’t a downgrade, but 2016 was definitely something—before the heavy AI-exploitation of today, the last time makeup felt like fun with a whole set of matte liquid lipsticks and heavy baked concealer, Taylor’s The 1989 album on repeat. It might sound like mere romanticizing of a certain era, like every other fashion trend that borrows from the past to go viral. Still, why has this specific era become the internet’s ‘collective obsession’? Was there truly something different about the air? Why do we want to go back to this particular slice of time when it has already been a decade? AI wasn’t there ‘living with us’ in 2016. Sure, AI was already progressing to reach how it is today, but still something ‘too far’ from that era to talk about. It was before AI took over our daily lives. Hence, people have come to a common conclusion that 2016 represents the last Golden Age of the organic internet. Instead of AI-generated content saturation that demands our attention, it was full of the raw and chaotic energy that made us ‘Humans’. Some may argue we’ve just run out of new ideas, but it’s rather a sign that we’re trying to bring the ‘human touch’ back, remembering that sometimes you have to look back ten years to move forward. In 2026, we are suffering from algorithmic fatigue. We crave 2016 because it was a time when ‘going viral’ meant a human accident rather than a curated performance. 2016 existed in a world where the digital space was still supplementary to physical life. Yet this changed dramatically with the COVID lockdowns, which transformed the digital space into the only accessible ‘third space’ for an entire generation. In contrast, 2016 represented a time when logging on felt like a choice rather than the only means of communication, a survival mechanism. The vibrancy we remember wasn’t a performance for an algorithm, confined within a screen. It was an overflow of real-world energy into digital spaces, not the other way around. Beyond the digital landscape, this human touch also existed in a loud aesthetic. The 2016 aesthetic stands in stark contrast to the minimalism that represents 2026. Everything has been moving towards a ‘quiet aesthetic’. No more of the sun-drenched, high contrast Los Angeles vibe. In an age where AI-generated imagery often feels too clean and conforming—much like the clean girl makeup trend—we feel at home looking back at the oversaturated energy of a decade ago. But this nostalgia runs deeper than mere visual preference. The bold aesthetics of 2016 reflected a particular cultural moment: the Obama era’s optimism and the rise of girlboss feminism, where progressivism felt tangible and unapologetic. We aren’t just missing old trends. We aren’t just nostalgic for the clothes we wore. We are hungry for the era’s unapologetic confidence that wasn’t afraid of looking ‘too-much’—a confidence that felt politically and socially aligned with a sense of forward momentum towards a society of acceptance. Finally, 2016 was the era of tropical house and indie-pop music that felt emotional and simultaneously highly energetic. Music is the ultimate time machine, and we all know for sure that the 2016 music hits were distinct. The Chainsmokers ruled the world. Justin Bieber’s Purpose was making the pop era at its peak. The moody anthems of Halsey, all the DJs making hits with legendary pop representatives, and Maddie Ziegler dancing to Sia’s consecutive hits defined a year in pop music that could not be replicated. This was a time when music felt like a communal experience, coming out of every car window and blaring on a festival stage. But now in 2026, music often feels like a background soundtrack designed for 15-seconds short clips just to show off your life on social media—not something that could define an entire summer. By hitting these decade-old anthems, revisiting our teenage playlists, we rewind to a world where music functioned as a shared heartbeat, rather than a mere tool to soundtrack a virtual version of ourselves that does not truly exist. Ultimately, the ‘2026 is the new 2016’ trend is far more than a simple aesthetic fashion cycle. Of course there is an endless list of eras worth romanticizing. Yet, the internet made a deliberate choice to anchor itself in 2016, suggesting something deeper than mere nostalgia. We are attempting to bring the human heartbeat back into a digital age that has become ‘too quiet’—and reconnect with a moment when boldness felt like progress. Sometimes we need to revisit the last time we truly felt like ourselves as a simple reminder: that before technology and social media reshaped how we connect, the raw, human spirit—authentic, unfiltered, and present—is what truly made life worth living. Our longing for 2016 isn’t really about the past, but a longing for that version of ourselves that didn’t lose the beat in the digital noise.
Have You Seen This Girl?: The Symbol of Hatsune Miku
Hatsune Miku is everywhere, and she is hard to miss. Even if the name is unfamiliar to you, you have probably seen her iconic teal pigtails—or, perhaps, you have heard of Vocaloid, the software from which the diva originates. Vocaloid is a voicebank software published by the Japanese company Crypton. Voicebanks are a collection of pre-recorded sounds that users can then “train” into saying whatever they desire, enabling music producers to give voice to their songs without hiring a vocalist. Crypton offers over 100 voicebanks (Vocaloids), each marketed with the image and name of an anime-style character. Yet, outside of the Vocaloid sphere, the internet rarely sees even Miku’s more popular colleagues like Kagamine Rin and Len. So, what makes her the breakout diva? To start, Miku’s immense popularity could be attributed to her status as Vocaloid’s official mascot, and thus the amount of exposure she naturally receives. Second, her relatively neutral voice and concept makes her flexible and easier to work with; compared to other more niche Vocaloids, like Kaai Yuki, all that is officially known about Miku is that she is a 16-year-old “android diva.” Most Vocaloid producers prefer to work within the given concepts of each Vocaloid, therefore making Miku the most appealing due to her “blank slate” state. However, what truly made Miku the icon she is today is how that neutrality in her voice extends into her design. Miku does not have a mundane design. On the contrary, it is eye-catching, her signature hair colour and style as well as the neon pink 01 tattoo instantly recognisable. It is these unique details that make her design so adaptable to different costumes and yet so identifiable: as long as just one of these features is maintained, she is recognisable. Consider more concept-heavy Vocaloids like Rin and Len, whose identities are dependent on their original silhouette that it works against their versatility. On the flip side, Megurine Luka, a Vocaloid whose only defining characteristic is her long, loose pink hair, becomes indistinguishable from the next pink-haired anime character once she is given a major hairstyle or outfit change. Thus, Miku became the perfect mirror for internet users to reflect themselves upon, casting her in every role they could imagine: a schoolgirl, a stuck-up princess, a racer, transcending race and even species. We could view Miku as indicative of changing trends and the internet’s collective wishes. Miku’s official design has changed with every iteration of the Vocaloid software, with 2007’s V2 Miku being the first, and 2026’s V6 being the latest to join the fray. Notably, although V3 and V4 Miku—which have thinner pigtails and a sleek, modern outfit—have been the official image of Miku for 13 years, V2 Miku has continued to receive just as much love and fanfare throughout their reign. If anything, she is the dominating image. When V6 Miku’s design was revealed, the fandom rejoiced at the clear return to the classics with the gray vest and plumage of teal hair. Interestingly, it was not only older fans who had experienced V2 Miku for themselves that cheered, but also new fans. Where does this new nostalgia stem from, and why is the fandom, famous for running wild with thousands of its own variations of Miku, still so obsessed with the “original Miku?” This “newgen” nostalgia for V2 Miku is derived from the growing consumer dissatisfaction with modern brand-making trends. With many of Vocaloid’s most well-known songs having been produced during the V2 era, new fans are obliged to become acquainted with this older Miku despite never experiencing her themselves. Often described as the “golden age”, it shows their dissatisfaction with the current fandom and fondness of the V2 days by proxy. This fondness is pushed further by how the V3 and V4 Miku lost the whimsical charm of V2 Miku that popularised her—in an attempt to conform to the rest of the industry. Known as debranding, this design trend has swept through nearly every brand, where logos and slogans that once made the brand feel personal are simplified to appeal to a broader audience. Consumers have been fighting against debranding ever since its spread, criticising how “corporate” and “clean” the world seems now. Therefore, the revival of V2 Miku in her V6 design can be seen as a “win” for the consumer: to have one’s wants recognised by the system feels as if real change is happening. Miku proves an interesting case study of today’s consumer landscape for both brands and consumers themselves. She is shaped almost entirely by her consumers; in watching how Miku evolves online, we can identify which direction not only the Vocaloid fandom but the greater consumer community wants merchandising and designs in brands to move. The consumer, however, must remain vigilant. Although V6 Miku may feel like we are being heard, is that truly the case, or is it another case of nostalgiabaiting to promote Crypton’s image as a consumer-friendly corporation? What are we telling corporations by putting so much emphasis on Miku’s official design instead of the leagues of fan designs that were once, too, popular?
Editor's Picks
FEATURES
Korea's Stablecoin Dilemma: Innovation, Risks, and the Future of the Digital Won
SNU SOCIETY
The Death of Campus Dining at SNU
ARTS & CULTURES
Is Korea's Baseball League Throwing Curveballs?
OPINION
Why I Believe in Journalism in the Age of AI
Quill Videos
Photojournals
Destinations imagined beyond the span
Forms surface in light, shadows cast
Momentum gathering along parallel paths